SMT. KALINDRI vs JUNIOR ENGINEER Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR — FA/105/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010170082026

Filing Number

FA/9833/2026

Filing Date

25-Apr-2026

Registration No

FA/105/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO TELEPHONE, ELECTRICITY ETC. ( 1209 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. KALINDRI

    Adv. RAJKUMAR PALI,Amit Kumar Sahu,Amit Kumar Sahu, ,PRATIBHA SAHU,PRATIBHA SAHU,Amit Kumar Sahu

  2. 2.Likeshwari Nishad

  3. 3.Gopal Nishad

  4. 4.Mukesh Nishad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUNIOR ENGINEER Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR

  2. 2.Executive Engineer

  3. 3.Ramdayal Nishad

  4. 4.State of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

  5. 5.Jethiyabai

  6. 6.Executive Engineer

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: FA No. 105/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur issued notices to respondents in this appeal filed by SMT. KALINDRI and others against a Junior Engineer and Executive Engineer. On 06/05/2026, the court ordered notices to be served on Respondents 1-3 and 5-6 within 7 days, with Respondent 4 accepting notice. The court called for the trial court record and adjourned the appeal for listing after service of notice is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA No. 105/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur issued notices to respondents in this appeal filed by SMT. KALINDRI and others against a Junior Engineer and Executive Engineer. On 06/05/2026, the court ordered notices to be served on Respondents 1-3 and 5-6 within 7 days, with Respondent 4 accepting notice. The court called for the trial court record and adjourned the appeal for listing after service of notice is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case