PRAKASH KUMAR CHANDNIHA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2262/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010169772026

Filing Number

WPC/9807/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/2262/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ELECTION MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO DISQUALIFICATION TO HOLD THE POSTS IN PANCHAYATS. ( 912 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH KUMAR CHANDNIHA

    Adv. Arvind Shrivastava,J.K. SHARMA,J.K. SHARMA, ,SYED JAYED ZIYA ALI,ANUMEH SHRIVASTAVA,ANUMEH SHRIVASTAVA,J.K. SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.COLLECTORATE

  3. 3.Sub-Divisional Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/2262/2026 Prakash Kumar Chandniha sought to quash a no-confidence motion against him as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Raksa and the Sub-Divisional Officer's order dated 17.04.2026 upholding it. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner's counsel indicated an efficacious appellate remedy was available, permitting withdrawal to pursue appeal before the appropriate appellate court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/2262/2026 Prakash Kumar Chandniha sought to quash a no-confidence motion against him as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Raksa and the Sub-Divisional Officer's order dated 17.04.2026 upholding it. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner's counsel indicated an efficacious appellate remedy was available, permitting withdrawal to pursue appeal before the appropriate appellate court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case