SUNIL KUMAR DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCC/532/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010169152026

Filing Number

MCC/9776/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCC/532/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MODIFICATION AND CLARIFICATION ( 1733 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

18-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR DEWANGAN

    Adv. Arpan Verma,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta, ,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,SHASHWAT MISHRA,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,MAYANK GUPTA,SHIVANGI AGRAWAL,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL,Rishabh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Chhattisgarh State Forest Development Corporation Ltd.

    Adv. SUYASH DHAR BADGAIYAN

  3. 3.Managing Director,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Sunil Kumar Dewangan's application for clerical correction in a prior order (WPS No. 5910 of 2021). The court corrected a typographical error where the disciplinary authority's departmental inquiry order date was incorrectly recorded as 22.08.2014 instead of the actual date of 29.11.2016 in paragraphs 2, 3, 6, and 8 of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCC/532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Sunil Kumar Dewangan's application for clerical correction in a prior order (WPS No. 5910 of 2021). The court corrected a typographical error where the disciplinary authority's departmental inquiry order date was incorrectly recorded as 22.08.2014 instead of the actual date of 29.11.2016 in paragraphs 2, 3, 6, and 8 of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case