NILESH SINGH vs MUSHMAT BUDHANI — WP227/528/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010169072026
Filing Number
WP227/9771/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP227/528/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NILESH SINGH
Adv. SUNIL TRIPATHI,Apoorva Tripathi,Apoorva Tripathi, ,ABHINAV DUBEY,ABHINAV DUBEY,Varsha Sharma,Apoorva Tripathi
-
2.Dinesh Das
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUSHMAT BUDHANI
-
2.Tej Bahadur Upadhyay
-
3.Vinay Kumar Upadhyay
-
4.Sesh Nath Upadhyay
-
5.Santosh Kumar Upadhyay
-
6.Smt. Khirmen Paikara,
-
7.State of Chhattisgarh
Adv. A.G.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WP227/528/2026 In this writ petition heard on 04/05/2026, Nilesh Singh challenged the trial court's rejection of his amendment application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC. Singh's original suit for specific performance of contract was filed on 12/05/2023; after the defendant filed a written statement on 26/02/2024, Singh sought to amend his pleadings but was rejected by the trial court. The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents 1-6 and adjourned the case for hearing immediately after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP227/528/2026
Case Summary: WP227/528/2026 In this writ petition heard on 04/05/2026, Nilesh Singh challenged the trial court's rejection of his amendment application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC. Singh's original suit for specific performance of contract was filed on 12/05/2023; after the defendant filed a written statement on 26/02/2024, Singh sought to amend his pleadings but was rejected by the trial court. The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents 1-6 and adjourned the case for hearing immediately after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts