SATISH DAHARIYA JITENDRA BANJARA, ,HEMANT KESHARWANI,ADITYA SRIVASTAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/665/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010168872026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7130/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/665/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH DAHARIYA JITENDRA BANJARA, ,HEMANT KESHARWANI,ADITYA SRIVASTAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Satish Dahariya's anticipatory bail application in connection with Crime No. 1360/2025. The court found that Dahariya was allegedly present at District Court premises on 15.11.2025 and actively participated in abusing the opposite party during a violent incident involving unlawful assembly and force against police. The court rejected his parity argument with co-accused Gyanendra Kumar Koshle, noting Koshle received bail on distinct grounds (student status, no criminal record), while Dahariya has criminal antecedents and was shown as an absconder in the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/665/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Satish Dahariya's anticipatory bail application in connection with Crime No. 1360/2025. The court found that Dahariya was allegedly present at District Court premises on 15.11.2025 and actively participated in abusing the opposite party during a violent incident involving unlawful assembly and force against police. The court rejected his parity argument with co-accused Gyanendra Kumar Koshle, noting Koshle received bail on distinct grounds (student status, no criminal record), while Dahariya has criminal antecedents and was shown as an absconder in the charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case