TEJ BAHADUR SINGH vs AJAY BAHADUR SINGH — WP227/541/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010168832026

Filing Number

WP227/9755/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP227/541/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TEJ BAHADUR SINGH

    Adv. MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,KAJAL CHANDRA,KAJAL CHANDRA, ,SAKSHI CHHABRA,SAKSHI CHHABRA,ANU MISHRA,KAJAL CHANDRA

  2. 2.Birendra Bahadur Singh

  3. 3.Rajesh Kumar Singh

  4. 4.Ashok Kumar Singh

  5. 5.Mahendra Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY BAHADUR SINGH

  2. 2.Ripti Singh

  3. 3.Rudrasha Bahadur

  4. 4.Dinesh Kumar Singh

  5. 5.State of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

  6. 6.Gayatri Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the writ petition filed by defendants Tej Bahadur Singh and others, setting aside the trial court's rejection of their application under Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC to file supporting documents. The court held that defendants' documents should be taken on record at the pre-evidence stage of the property dispute suit, regardless of eventual admissibility, as the trial court's dismissal as "frivolous" lacked proper reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/541/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the writ petition filed by defendants Tej Bahadur Singh and others, setting aside the trial court's rejection of their application under Order 8, Rule 1 of CPC to file supporting documents. The court held that defendants' documents should be taken on record at the pre-evidence stage of the property dispute suit, regardless of eventual admissibility, as the trial court's dismissal as "frivolous" lacked proper reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case