DAMYANTI MANDAL SONI ADARSH PATEL, AMIT KUMAR SINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPPIL/27/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010168722026

Filing Number

WPPIL/9749/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPPIL/27/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

LETTER PETITION & PIL MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 812 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAMYANTI MANDAL SONI ADARSH PATEL, AMIT KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.State of Chhattisgarh

  3. 3.State of Chhattisgarh

  4. 4.Chairman Chhattisgarh

    Adv. Animesh Tiwari

  5. 5.Collector

  6. 6.Superintendent of Police

  7. 7.Sub -Divisional

  8. 8.Director Town And Country

  9. 9.State Enviroment Impact

  10. 10.Municipal Corporation

    Adv. ANADI SHARMA

  11. 11.Shri Ghanshyam Dewangan,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WPPIL /27/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation filed by advocate Damyanti Mandal Soni challenging unauthorized water park construction at Village Kakrail, Rajnandgaon. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide cogent evidence of fraud in land diversion orders and that disputed factual issues require investigation by specialized statutory authorities, not PIL jurisdiction. Key Reasoning: The court found that allegations regarding illegal land diversion, missing environmental clearances, and unauthorized construction involve seriously disputed questions of fact requiring detailed inquiry by competent authorities. PIL jurisdiction cannot be used to resolve every factual controversy, and efficacious alternative remedies exist under relevant statutes. The security amount deposited was forfeited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPPIL/27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPPIL /27/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation filed by advocate Damyanti Mandal Soni challenging unauthorized water park construction at Village Kakrail, Rajnandgaon. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide cogent evidence of fraud in land diversion orders and that disputed factual issues require investigation by specialized statutory authorities, not PIL jurisdiction. Key Reasoning: The court found that allegations regarding illegal land diversion, missing environmental clearances, and unauthorized construction involve seriously disputed questions of fact requiring detailed inquiry by competent authorities. PIL jurisdiction cannot be used to resolve every factual controversy, and efficacious alternative remedies exist under relevant statutes. The security amount deposited was forfeited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case