ARJUN RAM SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3902/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010168652026
Filing Number
WPS/9744/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3902/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARJUN RAM SAHU
Adv. K.P. Sahu
-
2.Neelkanth Sahu
-
3.Smt. Malti Bai Yadav
-
4.Raghunandan Dhiwar
-
5.Shyamu Dewangan
-
6.Sakharam Sahu
-
7.Ganeshram Sahu
-
8.Savita Poddar
-
9.Smt. Kamla Bai Sahu
-
10.Gaurishankar Pandey
-
11.Dashrath Lal Sahu
-
12.Ramlal Sinha
-
13.Rajsika
-
14.Mohd. Shabbi Khan
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Under Secretary
-
3.The Engineer-In-Chief
-
4.The Director
-
5.The Chief Secretary
-
6.The Chief Engineer
-
7.The Chief Engineer
-
8.The Superintending Engineer (E and M)
-
9.The Executive Engineer
-
10.The Divisional Joint Director
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/3902/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing that the Supreme Court's judgment in SLP (C) No. 8677-8678/2023 shall apply to the petitioners' case regarding pension entitlements. The court held that since an identical issue is pending before the Supreme Court (which has already stayed similar High Court orders), there is no justifiable reason to keep this petition pending. If the Supreme Court decides favorably, respondents must extend benefits immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3902/2026
Case Summary: WPS/3902/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, directing that the Supreme Court's judgment in SLP (C) No. 8677-8678/2023 shall apply to the petitioners' case regarding pension entitlements. The court held that since an identical issue is pending before the Supreme Court (which has already stayed similar High Court orders), there is no justifiable reason to keep this petition pending. If the Supreme Court decides favorably, respondents must extend benefits immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts