SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs GHASNIN BAI DHRUV — MAC/1136/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010168562026
Filing Number
MAC/9740/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
MAC/1136/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO APPEALS FILED BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. ( 1205 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. ASHUTOSH RATHORE,Abhishek Choubey,Abhishek Choubey, ,Abhishek Choubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.GHASNIN BAI DHRUV
-
2.Neera Bai Dhruv
-
3.Mahesh Dhruv
-
4.Evan Dhruv
-
5.Dharamsing Dhruv
-
6.Kaushal Prasad Sahu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Shriram General Insurance's appeal challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 10,17,000 to claimants for the death of Thansingh Dhruv in a 2022 motorcycle accident. The court rejected all four grounds of appeal: the vehicle's involvement was established through credible witness testimony; no contributory negligence applied to the pillion rider; compensation was reasonable based on the deceased's assessed income and standard multipliers; and the driver's lack of valid license was properly determined against the insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/1136/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Shriram General Insurance's appeal challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs. 10,17,000 to claimants for the death of Thansingh Dhruv in a 2022 motorcycle accident. The court rejected all four grounds of appeal: the vehicle's involvement was established through credible witness testimony; no contributory negligence applied to the pillion rider; compensation was reasonable based on the deceased's assessed income and standard multipliers; and the driver's lack of valid license was properly determined against the insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts