SMT. MAMTA PARASTE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3814/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010168342026
Filing Number
WPS/9728/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3814/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. MAMTA PARASTE
Adv. MATEEN SIDDIQUI,SANDEEP SINGH,SANDEEP SINGH, ,RUPESH SAHU,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI,ABHYUDAY TRIPATHI,waquar naiyer,NARENDRA MEHAR,SANDEEP SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director
-
3.Joint Director
-
4.District Education Officer
-
5.Collector
-
6.Smt. Shweta Dixit
-
7.Smt. Shalini Rai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/3814/2026 Smt. Mamta Paraste, a lecturer at a two-shift school, challenged her transfer under the rationalization policy, claiming state directives prohibited transferring teachers from two-shift schools. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, allowing petitioner to withdraw and submit a representation before the State Level Committee, which was directed to decide within six weeks, recognizing an available alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3814/2026
Case Summary: WPS/3814/2026 Smt. Mamta Paraste, a lecturer at a two-shift school, challenged her transfer under the rationalization policy, claiming state directives prohibited transferring teachers from two-shift schools. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition, allowing petitioner to withdraw and submit a representation before the State Level Committee, which was directed to decide within six weeks, recognizing an available alternative remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts