LALU @ LALLURAM GENDLE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3990/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010168292026

Filing Number

MCRC/7104/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3990/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALU @ LALLURAM GENDLE

    Adv. HIMANSHU KUNJAM,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre, ,YOGESH KUMAR,YOGESH KUMAR,YOGESH KUMAR,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    MCRC/3990/2026 Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed bail for Lalu @ Lalluram Gendle, arrested for rape under Section 64(2)(k) BNS 2023. The court found that while the victim's initial statement alleged rape, her subsequent testimony as PW-2 did not support the prosecution case, and medical/forensic reports failed to corroborate the allegations. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and undertaking not to seek adjournments during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3990/2026

casestatus.in Summary

MCRC/3990/2026 Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed bail for Lalu @ Lalluram Gendle, arrested for rape under Section 64(2)(k) BNS 2023. The court found that while the victim's initial statement alleged rape, her subsequent testimony as PW-2 did not support the prosecution case, and medical/forensic reports failed to corroborate the allegations. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and undertaking not to seek adjournments during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case