POOJA DEVI AWASTHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1425/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010167472026
Filing Number
CRMP/7067/2026
Filing Date
23-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1425/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.POOJA DEVI AWASTHI
Adv. ARJUN YADAV,Arvind Kumar Dubey,Arvind Kumar Dubey, ,Vikas Shrivastava,Vikas Shrivastava,ABIRA BHATTACHARYA,Arvind Kumar Dubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Rishiraj Singhania
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: CRMP/1425/2026 Pooja Devi Awasthi v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim stay of proceedings against petitioner Pooja Devi Awasthi in Criminal Case No. 27110/2025 (Crime No. 97/2025, charges under BNS Sections 308(2), 238, and 3(5)). The court found insufficient prima facie evidence linking her to the alleged offenses, noting threats came from an unidentified person and monetary transactions involved a co-accused. The petition is adjourned for affidavits; the stay continues subject to her cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
23-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1425/2026
Case Summary: CRMP/1425/2026 Pooja Devi Awasthi v. State of Chhattisgarh The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim stay of proceedings against petitioner Pooja Devi Awasthi in Criminal Case No. 27110/2025 (Crime No. 97/2025, charges under BNS Sections 308(2), 238, and 3(5)). The court found insufficient prima facie evidence linking her to the alleged offenses, noting threats came from an unidentified person and monetary transactions involved a co-accused. The petition is adjourned for affidavits; the stay continues subject to her cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts