SAVITRI SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3846/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010167272026

Filing Number

WPS/9671/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3846/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVITRI SAHU

    Adv. ABDUL WAHAB KHAN,ABDUL MOIN KHAN,ABDUL MOIN KHAN, ,ABHISHEK DAHARIYA,ABDUL MOIN KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Aayukta

  3. 3.Sahayak Aayukta

  4. 4.Collector

  5. 5.Adhikshak

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3846/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Savitri Sahu's writ petition with directions to the Assistant Director (respondent no. 3) to decide her pending claim for contingency paid employee status, considering her 16 years of service since 2010. The court mandated a decision within 90 days and permitted the petitioner to submit additional comprehensive representations for consideration alongside her pending application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3846/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3846/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Savitri Sahu's writ petition with directions to the Assistant Director (respondent no. 3) to decide her pending claim for contingency paid employee status, considering her 16 years of service since 2010. The court mandated a decision within 90 days and permitted the petitioner to submit additional comprehensive representations for consideration alongside her pending application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case