MITHLESH KUMAR KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2175/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010167222026

Filing Number

WPC/9667/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/2175/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHLESH KUMAR KASHYAP

    Adv. ABDUL WAHAB KHAN,ABDUL MOIN KHAN,ABDUL MOIN KHAN, ,ABHISHEK DAHARIYA,ABDUL MOIN KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Sub Divisional Officer

  3. 3.Tehsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/2175/2026 Mithlesh Kumar Kashyap v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court directed state authorities to grant compensation to petitioner Mithlesh Kumar Kashyap for the death of his son by drowning, as required under the Revenue Book Circular. The court found that postmortem and supporting documents evidenced drowning death, entitling the petitioner to statutory compensation. Respondent authorities were ordered to pass appropriate orders within one month of receiving the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/2175/2026 Mithlesh Kumar Kashyap v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court directed state authorities to grant compensation to petitioner Mithlesh Kumar Kashyap for the death of his son by drowning, as required under the Revenue Book Circular. The court found that postmortem and supporting documents evidenced drowning death, entitling the petitioner to statutory compensation. Respondent authorities were ordered to pass appropriate orders within one month of receiving the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case