RANJEETA vs SURAJ MISHRA — CRMP/1289/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010167182026

Filing Number

CRMP/7054/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1289/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJEETA

    Adv. PAWAN KESHARWANI,ADITI DIWAN,ADITI DIWAN, ,ADITI DIWAN

  2. 2.Minor Aadya Atmaja Suraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP/1289/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gharghoda to decide the pending interim maintenance application filed by Ranjeeta (wife) and her minor daughter Aadya against respondent Suraj Mishra on or before 30.06.2026. The Court found that despite the application being filed on 10.05.2024 and the respondent appearing on 10.03.2025, unnecessary delays had occurred despite multiple opportunities granted for filing a reply, warranting judicial intervention to expedite the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP/1289/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gharghoda to decide the pending interim maintenance application filed by Ranjeeta (wife) and her minor daughter Aadya against respondent Suraj Mishra on or before 30.06.2026. The Court found that despite the application being filed on 10.05.2024 and the respondent appearing on 10.03.2025, unnecessary delays had occurred despite multiple opportunities granted for filing a reply, warranting judicial intervention to expedite the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case