RAJU LAHARIYA YASH WASNIKAR, ,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,YOGESH KUMAR,YOGESH KUMAR,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4018/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010166942026

Filing Number

MCRC/7041/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4018/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJU LAHARIYA YASH WASNIKAR, ,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,HIMANSHU KUNJAM,YOGESH KUMAR,YOGESH KUMAR,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4018/2026 In this High Court of Chhattisgarh matter, petitioner Raju Lahariya was accused of abetting the suicide of a woman with whom he had been in a three-year relationship. The allegation was that he brought her to his house and subsequently refused to marry her, leading to her suicide by hanging. The Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, adjourned the matter for further consideration and listed it for hearing in July 2026, taking into account the nature of allegations and the applicant's period of detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4018/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4018/2026 In this High Court of Chhattisgarh matter, petitioner Raju Lahariya was accused of abetting the suicide of a woman with whom he had been in a three-year relationship. The allegation was that he brought her to his house and subsequently refused to marry her, leading to her suicide by hanging. The Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, adjourned the matter for further consideration and listed it for hearing in July 2026, taking into account the nature of allegations and the applicant's period of detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case