SMT. KALPANA @ MUKTI vs SHRI ANIL THARWANI — CRR/605/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010166622026

Filing Number

CRR/7030/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/605/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MAINTENANCE U/S 144 & 146 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1402 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. KALPANA @ MUKTI

    Adv. SWATI RANI SARAF,DEVERSHI THAKUR,DEVERSHI THAKUR, ,ANAMIKA JAIN,ANAMIKA JAIN,ANAMIKA JAIN,PALAASH JHA,PALAASH JHA,RAVI KUMAR KASHYAP,SHALVIN SHARMA,DEVERSHI THAKUR

  2. 2.Ku. Tanishka

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI ANIL THARWANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: CRR/605/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the wife and daughter's revision petition challenging the Family Court's maintenance award of Rs. 2,500/month to the wife and Rs. 500/month to the 11-year-old daughter. Though the wife sought higher maintenance citing the husband's substantial business income (Rs. 1,50,000-2,00,000/month) and arguing the awarded amount was inadequate for the child's education and living expenses, the High Court found no illegality or infirmity in the lower court's reasoned order based on witness statements and evidence presented during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/605/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR/605/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the wife and daughter's revision petition challenging the Family Court's maintenance award of Rs. 2,500/month to the wife and Rs. 500/month to the 11-year-old daughter. Though the wife sought higher maintenance citing the husband's substantial business income (Rs. 1,50,000-2,00,000/month) and arguing the awarded amount was inadequate for the child's education and living expenses, the High Court found no illegality or infirmity in the lower court's reasoned order based on witness statements and evidence presented during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case