GOPAL KRISHNA SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2243/2025
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010166032025
Filing Number
WPC/9479/2025
Filing Date
28-Apr-2025
Registration No
WPC/2243/2025
Registration Date
01-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL KRISHNA SAHU
Adv. Ramayan Yadav,SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH,SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH, ,ANKUR DIWAN,Jai Prakash Tiwari,VIKHYAT ARORA,Ramayan Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Managing Director
Adv. UPASANA MEHTA
-
3.Manager (Incharge Gangrel Jalashay)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
In WPC 2243/2025, Gopal Krishna Sahu sought to set aside orders dated 01/04/2025 and 17/01/2025 issued by the State of Chhattisgarh's Fisheries Department and related entities. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn after the petitioner appeared in person and requested withdrawal. The court recorded that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and accepted the compromise terms as just, proper, and legal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar VermaView PDF
-
05-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
05-May-2025
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
28-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2243/2025
In WPC 2243/2025, Gopal Krishna Sahu sought to set aside orders dated 01/04/2025 and 17/01/2025 issued by the State of Chhattisgarh's Fisheries Department and related entities. The petition was disposed of as withdrawn after the petitioner appeared in person and requested withdrawal. The court recorded that the parties had amicably settled their dispute and accepted the compromise terms as just, proper, and legal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts