D. R. BAGHMARE vs SHRI K.N. KANDEY — CONT/648/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010165862026
Filing Number
CONT/9585/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
CONT/648/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )
Sub-Category
OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D. R. BAGHMARE
Adv. HARSHAL CHOUHAN,SULABH ARORA,SULABH ARORA, ,KESHAV DEWANGAN,KESHAV DEWANGAN,AKASH PANDEY,MAYANK CHANDRAKAR,SULABH ARORA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI K.N. KANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
Summary: CONT/648/2026 - D.R. Baghmare v. Shri K.N. Kandey The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the contempt petition after finding that the earlier court order dated 17/02/2026 had been complied with. Although the petitioner challenged the rejection of his representation by the bank's Managing Director (dated 08/04/2026), the court found no basis to continue contempt proceedings and disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies if unsatisfied with the rejection order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CONT/648/2026
Summary: CONT/648/2026 - D.R. Baghmare v. Shri K.N. Kandey The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the contempt petition after finding that the earlier court order dated 17/02/2026 had been complied with. Although the petitioner challenged the rejection of his representation by the bank's Managing Director (dated 08/04/2026), the court found no basis to continue contempt proceedings and disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to pursue alternative legal remedies if unsatisfied with the rejection order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts