PUNIT YADAV @ CHHOTU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4253/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010165772026

Filing Number

MCRC/6996/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4253/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNIT YADAV @ CHHOTU

    Adv. Sangeeta Soni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Punit Yadav (age 19) in a theft case involving Rs. 2,48,500 stolen from a hardware shop. Despite his two prior criminal antecedents and arrest based on a memorandum statement, the court found him entitled to bail considering the charge-sheet was already filed and he had been in custody since August 2025. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court appearances and no adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Punit Yadav (age 19) in a theft case involving Rs. 2,48,500 stolen from a hardware shop. Despite his two prior criminal antecedents and arrest based on a memorandum statement, the court found him entitled to bail considering the charge-sheet was already filed and he had been in custody since August 2025. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court appearances and no adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case