SURYAKANT TIWARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4077/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010165762026

Filing Number

MCRC/6995/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4077/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURYAKANT TIWARI

    Adv. ARUN KUKREJA,KALESH RAM RATRE,KALESH RAM RATRE, ,Manisha Yadav,VINDHYAWASHINI SONI,KALESH RAM RATRE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4077/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to five applicants, including Suryakant Tiwari, in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 54.10 lakhs. The applicants were arrested for allegedly operating multiple fraudulent mule bank accounts to receive and launder cyber fraud proceeds. While the court acknowledged their bank accounts received substantial amounts indicating active participation, it granted bail primarily on grounds of parity with identically situated co-accused who had already been granted bail by the Supreme Court and High Court. The release was conditional on furnishing personal bonds with sureties and strict compliance with trial court attendance and evidence procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4077/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4077/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to five applicants, including Suryakant Tiwari, in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 54.10 lakhs. The applicants were arrested for allegedly operating multiple fraudulent mule bank accounts to receive and launder cyber fraud proceeds. While the court acknowledged their bank accounts received substantial amounts indicating active participation, it granted bail primarily on grounds of parity with identically situated co-accused who had already been granted bail by the Supreme Court and High Court. The release was conditional on furnishing personal bonds with sureties and strict compliance with trial court attendance and evidence procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case