LAV KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/666/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010165072026

Filing Number

MCRCA/6960/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/666/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAV KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. PARAS MANI SHRIWAS,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas, ,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas,Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 666/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Lav Kumar Yadav, In-charge of a Paddy Procurement Centre, accused of criminal misconduct under Section 316(5) BNS 2023 relating to a shortage of 919.69 quintals of paddy causing ₹28,51,000 loss. The court found that no irregularities occurred during Yadav's tenure (verified by inspection on 20.12.2025), the alleged major shortage occurred after he left office, and he showed no criminal antecedents. Bail was granted with standard conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court appearance, while clarifying that his departmental suspension remains unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/666/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 666/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Lav Kumar Yadav, In-charge of a Paddy Procurement Centre, accused of criminal misconduct under Section 316(5) BNS 2023 relating to a shortage of 919.69 quintals of paddy causing ₹28,51,000 loss. The court found that no irregularities occurred during Yadav's tenure (verified by inspection on 20.12.2025), the alleged major shortage occurred after he left office, and he showed no criminal antecedents. Bail was granted with standard conditions including non-interference with witnesses and regular court appearance, while clarifying that his departmental suspension remains unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case