SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/4333/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010165062026

Filing Number

WPS/9547/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/4333/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF PAYMENT ( 632 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. SAUMYA SHARMA,Bharat Sharma,Bharat Sharma, ,Bharat Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Chairman (Appellate Authority)

  3. 3.The Managing Director

  4. 4.The General Manager

    Adv. Anuroop Panda

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/4333/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard the petition by Sunil Kumar Gupta against the State of Chhattisgarh. Judge Bibhu Datta Guru recused himself from the case because he had previously appeared as counsel in an earlier related petition (WPS No. 4932/2022 dated 20.07.2022) and represented one of the concerned parties. The court ordered that the case be listed before a different bench in which Judge Guru would not be a member, to avoid any conflict of interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4333/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/4333/2026 On 16.06.2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh heard the petition by Sunil Kumar Gupta against the State of Chhattisgarh. Judge Bibhu Datta Guru recused himself from the case because he had previously appeared as counsel in an earlier related petition (WPS No. 4932/2022 dated 20.07.2022) and represented one of the concerned parties. The court ordered that the case be listed before a different bench in which Judge Guru would not be a member, to avoid any conflict of interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case