MOHAN LAL DHRUV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3866/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010164952026
Filing Number
WPS/9540/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3866/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
REGULARIZATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 602 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN LAL DHRUV
Adv. ROHIT SHARMA,RAHUL SHARMA,RAHUL SHARMA, ,DEEPANJALI TIWARI,DEEPANJALI TIWARI,TREVENEE SHANKAR SAHU,RAHUL SHARMA
-
2.Sanjay Kumar Tikriha
-
3.Parmanand Bandhe
-
4.Lalit Kumar Chandrakar
-
5.Bharti Sahu
-
6.Avadhram Varma
-
7.Rajendra Verma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Additional Chief Secretary
-
3.Director
-
4.Collector Raipur
-
5.Chief Executive Officer
-
6.Committee for deciding the grievance of Panchayat Sachiv
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/3866/2026 Seven Panchayat Sachivs (secretaries) appointed in 1995-1996 challenged the State of Chhattisgarh's failure to act on the Chief Minister's public declaration (May 2022) to regularize them as government employees. The court found the state's inaction breached legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel, and directed authorities to constitute a committee and pass final orders within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3866/2026
Case Summary: WPS/3866/2026 Seven Panchayat Sachivs (secretaries) appointed in 1995-1996 challenged the State of Chhattisgarh's failure to act on the Chief Minister's public declaration (May 2022) to regularize them as government employees. The court found the state's inaction breached legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel, and directed authorities to constitute a committee and pass final orders within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts