SMT. GUDDI BAI ., ,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,AMAN KESHARWANI vs GHASNIN BAI Advocate - A.G. — SA/297/2022

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010163982022

Filing Number

SA/9227/2022

Filing Date

10-May-2022

Registration No

SA/297/2022

Registration Date

16-May-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION ( 1713 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. GUDDI BAI ., ,RISHIKANT MAHOBIA,AMAN KESHARWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHASNIN BAI Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Urmila Manikpuri

  3. 3.The State of Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed both second appeals and upheld the lower courts' decision that the 2015 sale deed transferring ancestral property to Guddi Bai was void, as the original owner (Basant Panika) lacked authority to alienate the entire property without consent of co-heirs including his daughter. The court found that since Basant Panika had already sold 3.66 of 5.84 ancestral acres, he exceeded his share when transferring the disputed 0.121 hectare parcel, rendering subsequent sales to Shivshankar Sahu equally invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar TiwariView PDF

  6. 23-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  7. 27-Jul-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  8. 13-Jun-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  9. 13-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 10-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/297/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed both second appeals and upheld the lower courts' decision that the 2015 sale deed transferring ancestral property to Guddi Bai was void, as the original owner (Basant Panika) lacked authority to alienate the entire property without consent of co-heirs including his daughter. The court found that since Basant Panika had already sold 3.66 of 5.84 ancestral acres, he exceeded his share when transferring the disputed 0.121 hectare parcel, rendering subsequent sales to Shivshankar Sahu equally invalid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case