UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs GOLA DAS — MAC/1109/2026

Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: CGHC010163182026

Filing Number

MAC/9448/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

MAC/1109/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO APPEALS FILED BY INSURANCE COMPANIES. ( 1205 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. RAJ AWASTHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOLA DAS

  2. 2.Preetam Das

  3. 3.Deepak Das

  4. 4.Devprakash Prajpati

  5. 5.Mohar Das

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted partial interim relief in United India Insurance Company's appeal against a claims tribunal award. The insurer must deposit 50% of the awarded amount with interest within 45 days, after which recovery of the remaining balance shall be stayed. The case involves a motor accident claim where the deceased was a pillion rider, and the insurer argues the policy only covered the vehicle, not pillion riders. The case is listed for October 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/1109/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted partial interim relief in United India Insurance Company's appeal against a claims tribunal award. The insurer must deposit 50% of the awarded amount with interest within 45 days, after which recovery of the remaining balance shall be stayed. The case involves a motor accident claim where the deceased was a pillion rider, and the insurer argues the policy only covered the vehicle, not pillion riders. The case is listed for October 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case