M/S LANDMARK ENGINEER vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2260/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010162262026
Filing Number
WPC/9390/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/2260/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )
Sub-Category
CONTRACT ACT. ( 2103 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S LANDMARK ENGINEER
Adv. Siddharth Shukla,SAMRIDDHI SHUKLA,SAMRIDDHI SHUKLA, ,PRITHVI RAJ SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Collector
-
3.Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency
-
4.Executive Engineer
-
5.Chief Engineer CGRRDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: M/S Landmark Engineer v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPC 2260/2026) The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed M/S Landmark Engineer's writ petition seeking release of Rs. 3.11 crore withheld from final payment for completed road construction work, finding the dispute involved contested factual questions unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. The court held that while the petitioner argued the withholding lacked contractual basis and was arbitrary, resolution required examining disputed facts about royalty compliance obligations—matters better suited to civil suits or arbitration than extraordinary constitutional remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2260/2026
Case Summary: M/S Landmark Engineer v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPC 2260/2026) The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed M/S Landmark Engineer's writ petition seeking release of Rs. 3.11 crore withheld from final payment for completed road construction work, finding the dispute involved contested factual questions unsuitable for writ jurisdiction. The court held that while the petitioner argued the withholding lacked contractual basis and was arbitrary, resolution required examining disputed facts about royalty compliance obligations—matters better suited to civil suits or arbitration than extraordinary constitutional remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts