BHUSHAN SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/681/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010161392026

Filing Number

MCRCA/6810/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/681/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUSHAN SHARMA

    Adv. ABHYUDAY TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary of MCRCA /681/2026 – Bhushan Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Bhushan Sharma in a narcotic-related death case. Sharma was accused of facilitating drug procurement by providing internet hotspot connectivity in connection with a truck driver's fatal overdose. The court found his name absent from the FIR, his involvement surfaced only through co-accused statements, no narcotics were recovered from him, and he was not present at the occurrence. Since similarly-situated co-accused had already received bail and the chargesheet was filed, the court extended bail on grounds of parity, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court appearance and no adjournment-seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/681/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MCRCA /681/2026 – Bhushan Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Bhushan Sharma in a narcotic-related death case. Sharma was accused of facilitating drug procurement by providing internet hotspot connectivity in connection with a truck driver's fatal overdose. The court found his name absent from the FIR, his involvement surfaced only through co-accused statements, no narcotics were recovered from him, and he was not present at the occurrence. Since similarly-situated co-accused had already received bail and the chargesheet was filed, the court extended bail on grounds of parity, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court appearance and no adjournment-seeking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case