SAIYED JUNAID vs SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED Advocate - VAIBHAV SHUKLA, ,ADITI DIWAN,PAWAN KUMAR KESHARWANI — WPS/3827/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010160422026

Filing Number

WPS/9288/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3827/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF PAYMENT ( 632 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIYED JUNAID

    Adv. Kapil Maini,Resham lal Jaiswal,Resham lal Jaiswal, ,PRAKANT SETHI,Resham lal Jaiswal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED Advocate - VAIBHAV SHUKLA, ,ADITI DIWAN,PAWAN KUMAR KESHARWANI

  2. 2.The Deputy Manager (H.R.)

  3. 3.The Assistant Manager (Finance)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3827/2026 Saiyed Junaid, a Class IV employee of South Eastern Coalfields Limited, challenged a recovery order for Rs. 91,721.15. The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents returnable in three weeks. As interim relief, the court directed that no recovery shall be made from the petitioner pending the next hearing, finding the recovery potentially impermissible under law. Case adjourned for three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3827/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3827/2026 Saiyed Junaid, a Class IV employee of South Eastern Coalfields Limited, challenged a recovery order for Rs. 91,721.15. The High Court of Chhattisgarh issued notice to respondents returnable in three weeks. As interim relief, the court directed that no recovery shall be made from the petitioner pending the next hearing, finding the recovery potentially impermissible under law. Case adjourned for three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case