RAMPRASAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2188/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010159342026

Filing Number

WPC/9224/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/2188/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPRASAD

    Adv. PRIYANKA MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  3. 3.State Level Forest

  4. 4.Presidednt District Level Forest

  5. 5.Additional Commissioner,

  6. 6.Chief Excutive Officer,

  7. 7.President,

  8. 8.Gram Sabha

  9. 9.Gram Panchayat

  10. 10.Forest Right Committee

  11. 11.District Forest Officer,

  12. 12.Superintendent

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Summary: In WPC No. 2188/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (04.05.2026) heard the petition by Ramprasad against the State of Chhattisgarh and others. The court issued notices to all respondents, with the State Counsel accepting notice on behalf of respondents 1-5, 7, 11-12. Notices were separately issued to respondents 6, 8-10 via ordinary and speed post modes. The case was adjourned for six weeks, with respondents granted four weeks to file replies and the petitioner granted two weeks thereafter to file rejoinder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2188/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPC No. 2188/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur (04.05.2026) heard the petition by Ramprasad against the State of Chhattisgarh and others. The court issued notices to all respondents, with the State Counsel accepting notice on behalf of respondents 1-5, 7, 11-12. Notices were separately issued to respondents 6, 8-10 via ordinary and speed post modes. The case was adjourned for six weeks, with respondents granted four weeks to file replies and the petitioner granted two weeks thereafter to file rejoinder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case