RAJESH KUMAR KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3933/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010158682026

Filing Number

WPS/9185/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3933/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR KASHYAP

    Adv. Baldau Prasad Banjare,JYOTI PRABHA BANJARE,JYOTI PRABHA BANJARE, JYOTI PRABHA BANJARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Joint Director

  4. 4.Collector

  5. 5.Assistant Commissioner

  6. 6.District Education Officer

  7. 7.Principal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3933/2026 Rajesh Kumar Kashyap, employed since 1989, sought regularization to permanent pay scale under contingency services rules. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing him to file a detailed fresh representation to the Joint Director (Respondent 3) with supporting documents, including relevant government orders and High Court precedents. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on entitlement and granted Respondent 3 ninety days to decide the representation according to applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3933/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3933/2026 Rajesh Kumar Kashyap, employed since 1989, sought regularization to permanent pay scale under contingency services rules. The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing him to file a detailed fresh representation to the Joint Director (Respondent 3) with supporting documents, including relevant government orders and High Court precedents. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on entitlement and granted Respondent 3 ninety days to decide the representation according to applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case