MOHD. RAHMAT ANSARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/1046/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010157962026

Filing Number

CRA/6659/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRA/1046/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT ( 1429 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. RAHMAT ANSARI

    Adv. SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA, ,KHILENDRA SAHU,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA No. 1046/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the criminal appeal filed by Mohd. Rahmat Ansari on 06.05.2026. The court directed the State to file its reply/objection to the interim application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail within two weeks, and ordered the appellant to provide information regarding his criminal antecedents. The matter was adjourned for further consideration on the bail application after receipt of trial court records and paper-book filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/1046/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA No. 1046/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted the criminal appeal filed by Mohd. Rahmat Ansari on 06.05.2026. The court directed the State to file its reply/objection to the interim application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail within two weeks, and ordered the appellant to provide information regarding his criminal antecedents. The matter was adjourned for further consideration on the bail application after receipt of trial court records and paper-book filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case