SHANTA KUMAR GHADGE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — WPS/3867/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010155612026

Filing Number

WPS/8994/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3867/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTA KUMAR GHADGE

    Adv. ABHISHEK SINGH,S.P.KALE,S.P.KALE, ,AMOD KUMAR SHRIVASTAV,AMOD KUMAR SHRIVASTAV,LAV SHARMA,S.P.KALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  2. 2.Engineer -In Chief

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Accountant General

    Adv. RAJ KUMAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Shanta Kumar Ghadge's writ petition seeking pension credit for his pre-regularization service period, holding that the issue is identical to matters pending before the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Nos. 8677-8678/2023. The court directed that the Supreme Court's decision in those cases will govern the petitioner's entitlement to additional pension benefits, with instructions that respondents implement any favorable ruling without delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3867/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Shanta Kumar Ghadge's writ petition seeking pension credit for his pre-regularization service period, holding that the issue is identical to matters pending before the Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Nos. 8677-8678/2023. The court directed that the Supreme Court's decision in those cases will govern the petitioner's entitlement to additional pension benefits, with instructions that respondents implement any favorable ruling without delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case