SANJAY KUMAR SURYAVANSHI vs RAVISHANKAR DAS Advocate - S.B. PANDEY, ,SUSHIL SAHU — MAC/909/2019

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010155132019

Filing Number

MAC/8932/2019

Filing Date

30-Apr-2019

Registration No

MAC/909/2019

Registration Date

08-May-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS. ( 1210 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KUMAR SURYAVANSHI

    Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR,Kishan lal Sahu,Kishan lal Sahu, ,Kishan lal Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVISHANKAR DAS Advocate - S.B. PANDEY, ,SUSHIL SAHU

  2. 2.Purendu Goswani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside the lower tribunal's rejection of Sanjay Kumar Suryavanshi's motor accident claim, finding sufficient evidence (FIR, spot map, claimant's testimony) that his injuries resulted from rash and negligent driving by the vehicle driver. The case was remitted to the Claims Tribunal for fresh examination of parties and witnesses, with directions to pass a new award within 4 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 29-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  6. 14-May-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam ChourdiyaView PDF

  7. 14-May-2019

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya

  8. 30-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/909/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside the lower tribunal's rejection of Sanjay Kumar Suryavanshi's motor accident claim, finding sufficient evidence (FIR, spot map, claimant's testimony) that his injuries resulted from rash and negligent driving by the vehicle driver. The case was remitted to the Claims Tribunal for fresh examination of parties and witnesses, with directions to pass a new award within 4 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case