YASHWANT KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAJ KUMAR GUPTA — WPS/3546/2022
Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010154582022
Filing Number
WPS/8666/2022
Filing Date
04-May-2022
Registration No
WPS/3546/2022
Registration Date
10-May-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YASHWANT KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Adv. SOURABH SAHU,Somraj Shrivastava,Somraj Shrivastava, ,MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,ISHA JAJODIA,NEHA SHRIVASTAVA,SONAM SHUKLA,Somraj Shrivastava
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,RAJ KUMAR GUPTA
-
2.Chief Medical and Health Officer
-
3.Block Medical Officer
-
4.Accountant General (Pension)
-
5.Joint Director
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh quashed recovery orders against retired government servants for excess General Provident Fund (GPF) withdrawals, holding that under Rule 66(3)(a) of the Chhattisgarh Pension Rules 1976, departments must assess and recover Government dues within six months of retirement—failure to do so extinguishes the recovery claim. The court ordered refund of any amounts already recovered with 5% per annum interest, finding the recovery orders passed years after retirement violated statutory timelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
27-Jun-2022
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
13-May-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
12-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3546/2022
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh quashed recovery orders against retired government servants for excess General Provident Fund (GPF) withdrawals, holding that under Rule 66(3)(a) of the Chhattisgarh Pension Rules 1976, departments must assess and recover Government dues within six months of retirement—failure to do so extinguishes the recovery claim. The court ordered refund of any amounts already recovered with 5% per annum interest, finding the recovery orders passed years after retirement violated statutory timelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts