DEEPAK TIWARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3977/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010154102026

Filing Number

MCRC/6522/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3977/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK TIWARI

    Adv. SHIVENDU PANDYA,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK, ,POOJA YADAV,SMT. JYOTI KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 3977/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Deepak Tiwari, arrested in a motorcycle robbery case involving gunpoint threats. The court found that while the charges were serious (robbery, Arms Act violations), the evidence against Tiwari was weak—he was implicated primarily through co-accused statements without independent evidence, and the allegedly looted property was not seized from his possession. The court considered that a similarly-placed co-accused had already received bail, Tiwari had been in custody since October 2025, and the trial would take considerable time, ordering his release on personal bond with two sureties and strict attendance conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3977/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 3977/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Deepak Tiwari, arrested in a motorcycle robbery case involving gunpoint threats. The court found that while the charges were serious (robbery, Arms Act violations), the evidence against Tiwari was weak—he was implicated primarily through co-accused statements without independent evidence, and the allegedly looted property was not seized from his possession. The court considered that a similarly-placed co-accused had already received bail, Tiwari had been in custody since October 2025, and the trial would take considerable time, ordering his release on personal bond with two sureties and strict attendance conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case