MOHAR MANIYA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4071/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010153852026

Filing Number

MCRC/6498/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4071/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAR MANIYA

    Adv. Deepali Gupta,DIWESH KUMAR,DIWESH KUMAR, ,DIWESH KUMAR

  2. 2.Shrawan Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 4071/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of Mohar Maniya and Shrawan Kumar, accused of illegal trafficking in narcotic injections under NDPS Act Sections 21(C), 27(A) & 29. The court found prima facie evidence that both applicants were part of an organized drug distribution network, with large quantities of Rexogesic and Avil injections (far exceeding commercial limits) seized from their possession and co-accused persons' joint possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4071/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 4071/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of Mohar Maniya and Shrawan Kumar, accused of illegal trafficking in narcotic injections under NDPS Act Sections 21(C), 27(A) & 29. The court found prima facie evidence that both applicants were part of an organized drug distribution network, with large quantities of Rexogesic and Avil injections (far exceeding commercial limits) seized from their possession and co-accused persons' joint possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case