SUKHDEV RATHIA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1991/2026

Disposed: Contested--NON PROSECUTION on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010150852026

Filing Number

WPC/8700/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/1991/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHDEV RATHIA

    Adv. KU. VARSHA SAO,SMT. KHUSBOO SAO,SMT. KHUSBOO SAO, ,MAHIMA TANDAN,SMT. KHUSBOO SAO

  2. 2.Dhansay Rathia

  3. 3.Teju Rathia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector, Raigarh

  3. 3.The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)

  4. 4.The Tahsildar, Tamnar

  5. 5.N T P C Limited

    Adv. Anuroop Panda

  6. 6.Nanhiram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPC 1991/2026 for want of prosecution on May 6, 2026. The petitioners (Sukhdev Rathia, Dhansay Rathia, and Teju Rathia) failed to appear or provide representation despite the matter being called twice at 4:00 pm, leaving the court no option but to dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1991/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPC 1991/2026 for want of prosecution on May 6, 2026. The petitioners (Sukhdev Rathia, Dhansay Rathia, and Teju Rathia) failed to appear or provide representation despite the matter being called twice at 4:00 pm, leaving the court no option but to dismiss the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case