T. SHIV KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3640/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010150772026

Filing Number

MCRC/6384/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3640/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.T. SHIV KUMAR

    Adv. KUNAL DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/3640/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to T. Shiv Kumar, arrested for theft of iron rods worth Rs. 1,80,000 from a construction site under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court considered that he had only one prior criminal antecedent, the chargesheet was filed, he had been in custody since January 17, 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during witness examination, and compliance with BNS provisions on proclamation and statement recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3640/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/3640/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to T. Shiv Kumar, arrested for theft of iron rods worth Rs. 1,80,000 from a construction site under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court considered that he had only one prior criminal antecedent, the chargesheet was filed, he had been in custody since January 17, 2026, and trial conclusion would take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during witness examination, and compliance with BNS provisions on proclamation and statement recording. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case