TULSINAND SAHU SAUMYA VAISHNAV, ,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI,SAHIL SAHU,ANSHIT SINGH HORA,Ravindra Sharma,AKASH AGRAWAL,Amrita Sharma,Amrita Sharma vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/578/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010150602026
Filing Number
MCRCA/6374/2026
Filing Date
13-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/578/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TULSINAND SAHU SAUMYA VAISHNAV, ,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI,SAHIL SAHU,ANSHIT SINGH HORA,Ravindra Sharma,AKASH AGRAWAL,Amrita Sharma,Amrita Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRCA 578/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to applicant Tulsinand Sahu in a fraud case involving Rs. 81 lakh allegedly taken for share market investment that was never returned. The court allowed the bail application despite Tulsinand Sahu's four prior criminal antecedents, citing that co-accused persons had already been granted similar relief, and imposed standard conditions including personal bond with surety, court appearance, and prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
13-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/578/2026
Case Summary: MCRCA 578/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to applicant Tulsinand Sahu in a fraud case involving Rs. 81 lakh allegedly taken for share market investment that was never returned. The court allowed the bail application despite Tulsinand Sahu's four prior criminal antecedents, citing that co-accused persons had already been granted similar relief, and imposed standard conditions including personal bond with surety, court appearance, and prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts