VISHNU DAS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4212/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010150362026

Filing Number

MCRC/6362/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4212/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU DAS

    Adv. KUNAL DAS

  2. 2.Chandra Bhushan @ Bittu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Vishnu Das and Chandra Bhushan @ Bittu, arrested in a theft case involving Rs. 1,80,000 worth of TMT bars from a railway construction site. The court found that no stolen material was recovered from the applicants (only from co-accused Akash Gupta), their implication rested primarily on co-accused statements, and they had already been jailed since January 17, 2026 with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each and undertakings to appear on all trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Vishnu Das and Chandra Bhushan @ Bittu, arrested in a theft case involving Rs. 1,80,000 worth of TMT bars from a railway construction site. The court found that no stolen material was recovered from the applicants (only from co-accused Akash Gupta), their implication rested primarily on co-accused statements, and they had already been jailed since January 17, 2026 with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bonds with two sureties each and undertakings to appear on all trial dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case