AKSHAY KUMAR PRADHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCC/432/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010149272026

Filing Number

MCC/8616/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCC/432/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION ( 1732 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKSHAY KUMAR PRADHAN

    Adv. ishan verma,KSHAMANIDHI MEHER,KSHAMANIDHI MEHER, ,VIKRAM USENDI,IMRAN AHMED KHAN,KSHAMANIDHI MEHER

  2. 2.Sukhi Ram Basant

  3. 3.Dhani Ram Pradhan

  4. 4.Govind Ram Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.District Education Officer

  4. 4.Block Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary of MCC No. 432/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 506/2021. The court found that despite five years having elapsed since defects were identified by the Registry in 2021, and despite being granted a six-week extension in August 2023, the petitioners (four government school teachers) failed to rectify the procedural defects. The court refused to grant further indulgence, citing the applicants' prolonged non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCC/432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MCC No. 432/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 506/2021. The court found that despite five years having elapsed since defects were identified by the Registry in 2021, and despite being granted a six-week extension in August 2023, the petitioners (four government school teachers) failed to rectify the procedural defects. The court refused to grant further indulgence, citing the applicants' prolonged non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case