M/S LALCHANDANI CHEMICALS vs CANARA BANK Advocate - PURANJAY BHATT, ,Mayank Kumar — WP227/452/2026

Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Next hearing 15-May-2026

CNR: CGHC010149142026

Filing Number

WP227/8607/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP227/452/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S LALCHANDANI CHEMICALS

    Adv. VIKAS UPADHYAY,SATISH CHANDRA,SATISH CHANDRA, ,MANAS VAJPAI,Pritam Singh,SHALVIN SHARMA,SHALVIN SHARMA,SHALVIN SHARMA,Ramayan Yadav,Ramayan Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CANARA BANK Advocate - PURANJAY BHATT, ,Mayank Kumar

  2. 2.District Magistrate/ Collector

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Tahsildar

Case History

  1. 15-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief by staying the effect and operation of a memo dated 08.04.2026 issued by Tehsildar Bodri regarding possession of secured assets. The court found merit in the petitioner's argument that a prior 15-day notice requirement (as per DRT's earlier order) was not followed, and noted that the Debts Recovery Tribunal Jabalpur—where a related Second Appeal is pending—is non-functional. The case is adjourned to the second week of May 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief by staying the effect and operation of a memo dated 08.04.2026 issued by Tehsildar Bodri regarding possession of secured assets. The court found merit in the petitioner's argument that a prior 15-day notice requirement (as per DRT's earlier order) was not followed, and noted that the Debts Recovery Tribunal Jabalpur—where a related Second Appeal is pending—is non-functional. The case is adjourned to the second week of May 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case