VISHAL SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1067/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010146952026

Filing Number

CRMP/6217/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1067/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL SAHU

    Adv. GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,Gaurav Singhal,Gaurav Singhal, ,PRANOTI DAS,PRANOTI DAS,SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,Gaurav Singhal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Rahul Sonwani

    Adv. Amit Kumar Verma

  3. 3.Rahul Bansal,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP/1067/2026 Vishal Sahu sought quashing of FIR No. 329/2025 (registered under multiple BNS sections and SC/ST Atrocities Act) claiming false implication without material evidence. The petitioner argued the dispute with complainant Rahul Sonwani was amicably settled through a compromise deed executed voluntarily. The complainant's counsel did not dispute this settlement. The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the Investigating Officer to consider the compromise deed and submit the police report accordingly, disposing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1067/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP/1067/2026 Vishal Sahu sought quashing of FIR No. 329/2025 (registered under multiple BNS sections and SC/ST Atrocities Act) claiming false implication without material evidence. The petitioner argued the dispute with complainant Rahul Sonwani was amicably settled through a compromise deed executed voluntarily. The complainant's counsel did not dispute this settlement. The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the Investigating Officer to consider the compromise deed and submit the police report accordingly, disposing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case