MURARI YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCC/503/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010146872026

Filing Number

MCC/8473/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCC/503/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION ( 1732 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURARI YADAV

    Adv. Ram Vifal Ram Rajwade,Savita Rajwade,Savita Rajwade, ,Savita Rajwade,Savita Rajwade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Director,

  3. 3.The principal

  4. 4.The Labour Commissioner,

  5. 5.The Collector,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Murari Yadav's Miscellaneous application (MCC 503/2026) seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 6150/2023, which had been dismissed on 24.02.2026 for want of prosecution. Finding the non-appearance was unintentional and bonafide, Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad restored the petition to its original number with the State's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCC/503/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Murari Yadav's Miscellaneous application (MCC 503/2026) seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 6150/2023, which had been dismissed on 24.02.2026 for want of prosecution. Finding the non-appearance was unintentional and bonafide, Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad restored the petition to its original number with the State's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case