AJAY KUMAR SAHU vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3427/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010146812026

Filing Number

MCRC/6211/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3427/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR SAHU

    Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.Chiranjiv Kumar Sahu @ Harish Sahu

  3. 3.Omesh Kumar Sahu @ Lala

  4. 4.Deepak Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC 3427/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to four applicants (Ajay Kumar Sahu, Chiranjiv Kumar Sahu, Omesh Kumar Sahu, and Deepak Yadav) arrested for assault and unlawful assembly. The court found that similarly situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the charge-sheet was filed, applicants had no criminal antecedents, and specific assault allegations involving weapons were directed at a different co-accused, warranting release on personal bond with sureties subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC 3427/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to four applicants (Ajay Kumar Sahu, Chiranjiv Kumar Sahu, Omesh Kumar Sahu, and Deepak Yadav) arrested for assault and unlawful assembly. The court found that similarly situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the charge-sheet was filed, applicants had no criminal antecedents, and specific assault allegations involving weapons were directed at a different co-accused, warranting release on personal bond with sureties subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case