ROSHAN SHRIVAS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3436/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010146802026
Filing Number
MCRC/6210/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/3436/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROSHAN SHRIVAS
Adv. RAHUL GOSWAMI,DHARMENDRA BAGHEL,DHARMENDRA BAGHEL, ,T.R.CHANDRAKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC/3436/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Roshan Shrivas, arrested for alleged mobile phone snatching (Sections 304(2) and 3(5), Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023). The court found him entitled to bail considering he had been in custody since 27.01.2026, the chargesheet was already filed, trial would take considerable time, and no incriminating articles were seized from him. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance and non-adjournment requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/3436/2026
Case Summary: MCRC/3436/2026 Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to applicant Roshan Shrivas, arrested for alleged mobile phone snatching (Sections 304(2) and 3(5), Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023). The court found him entitled to bail considering he had been in custody since 27.01.2026, the chargesheet was already filed, trial would take considerable time, and no incriminating articles were seized from him. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance and non-adjournment requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts