KRISHAK SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT BILTUKRI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2214/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010146392026

Filing Number

WPC/8447/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/2214/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAK SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT BILTUKRI

    Adv. MALLICK SUDIP RAVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Joint Commissioner,

  3. 3.Assistant Commissioner,

  4. 4.Collector District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/2214/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as premature. The court held that the April 2, 2026 letter initiating proceedings under Section 58(b) of the Co-operative Societies Act was merely a preliminary communication authorizing investigation into alleged paddy procurement losses, not a final determination imposing liability. The petitioner will have full opportunity to raise all objections before the competent authority during formal proceedings and may pursue remedies if an adverse final order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/2214/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as premature. The court held that the April 2, 2026 letter initiating proceedings under Section 58(b) of the Co-operative Societies Act was merely a preliminary communication authorizing investigation into alleged paddy procurement losses, not a final determination imposing liability. The petitioner will have full opportunity to raise all objections before the competent authority during formal proceedings and may pursue remedies if an adverse final order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case