RENLAL RATRE ARINDAM MITRA, ,SHRADDHA MISHRA,PRITHVI RAJ SAHU,PRITHVI RAJ SAHU,PRATEEK SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,Aftabun Nisha,Aftabun Nisha — MCRCA/555/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010146282026
Filing Number
MCRCA/6189/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/555/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RENLAL RATRE ARINDAM MITRA, ,SHRADDHA MISHRA,PRITHVI RAJ SAHU,PRITHVI RAJ SAHU,PRATEEK SHARMA
-
2.Murli Dhruv,
-
3.Gopal Das Jangade,
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,Aftabun Nisha,Aftabun Nisha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRCA 555/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to three applicants (Renlal Ratre, Murli Dhruv, and Gopal Das Jangade) accused of illegally issuing residential land certificates (abadi pattas) on government grassland while serving as Gram Panchayat officials. The Court found that allegations were primarily assertion-based with only disputed photocopies as evidence, the investigation was preliminary, and no specific roles were attributed to the applicants, warranting bail pending trial. Release was conditioned on personal bonds, sureties, non-interference with witnesses, court appearances, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/555/2026
Case Summary: MCRCA 555/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to three applicants (Renlal Ratre, Murli Dhruv, and Gopal Das Jangade) accused of illegally issuing residential land certificates (abadi pattas) on government grassland while serving as Gram Panchayat officials. The Court found that allegations were primarily assertion-based with only disputed photocopies as evidence, the investigation was preliminary, and no specific roles were attributed to the applicants, warranting bail pending trial. Release was conditioned on personal bonds, sureties, non-interference with witnesses, court appearances, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts