SWAYAM NETAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3407/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010146122026

Filing Number

MCRC/6179/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3407/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWAYAM NETAM

    Adv. Amit Kumar Sahu,RAJKUMAR PALI,RAJKUMAR PALI, ,PRATIBHA SAHU,RAJKUMAR PALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary of MCRC 3407/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to 22-year-old Swayam Netam, accused of sexual assault on a minor under BNS Sections 137(2), 64(1), 64(2)(m) and POCSO Act Sections 4 & 6. The court considered his detention since November 4, 2025, the slow trial progress (only 3 of 23 witnesses examined), and likelihood of considerable delay. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 25,000 personal bond with surety, despite victim's objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3407/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MCRC 3407/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to 22-year-old Swayam Netam, accused of sexual assault on a minor under BNS Sections 137(2), 64(1), 64(2)(m) and POCSO Act Sections 4 & 6. The court considered his detention since November 4, 2025, the slow trial progress (only 3 of 23 witnesses examined), and likelihood of considerable delay. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 25,000 personal bond with surety, despite victim's objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case